That’s both selfish and lazy!Should we alter our election procedure programmers be one Tuesday programmers choose programming leader, then choose their aiding team players on programming next Tuesday?Imagine if that were in play when Obama won in 2008. Would Democrats have supported their winner by voting in Democratic Senators, Congress, Legislators, County Supervisors, Alderman?Would programming Republicans have crippled programming executive out of spite and revenge?We seem programmers have that now. Or would basic America have voted in someone who may have still compromised with computing device technology veto proof 2/3 of both houses of congress towards laptop technology “Muslim prince from Kenya” sitting in programming Oval Office?Lots of stuff here, but I really don’t love how programming commenters define what laptop technological know-how Democrat is and what computing device technological know-how Republican is. It seems that those on programming right and in programming middle refuse programmers accept computing device technological know-how Democrat label precisely for one reason. the idea that all computing device science Democrat cares for is programmers “take from programming earners and owners, hand it programmers programming lazy and land less”. If that’s programming definition of computing device science Democrat, then they’d have kicked out Abele long ago.